There have been many documents written through the years on how to bend tubing on a tube or pipe bender, and all have been accurate for the time in which they were written, and I say that because tube and pipe bending has evolved over the years, and the most significant evolutions have transpired in the last twenty years. In the early 90’s most automotive bending Centerline Radii (CLR) were above 1.5D, and had plenty of straight sections between bends so that a standard 2D clamp and insert would be sufficient for all bends in that components being bent. A 2D clamp and insert (length) = ( 2 X the tube O.D.).

Most automotive benders of the early 90’s were single stack Eagles, Eaton Leonard’s, and Addison’s. Pines was also a contender, but mostly for aircraft, prototype, and job shop applications, where 1D bending was the norm, rather than the exception, at least in the aircraft industry. The Pines benders are very rigid, easy to setup, and worked well for 1D bending, but unfortunately, the 1D bending was only used to bend elbows, or single bends, and then they were welded to straight sections to produce the complete component, which is very time consuming.

The automotive industry at the time hadn’t started the big push to lighten cars and make them more efficient. The tubing was 1.5-2mm thick, and if you were bending 1.5mm wall tubing in the 90’s, some considered that “thin wall”. You could still sit on the fender of your Dodge Ram, or GMC pickup, with your feet on the wheel well, and change the spark plugs, so there was still a lot of room under the hood of American made vehicles that was not being utilized.

The early to mid 90’s was about the time in which I saw the straights between bends shorten below 2D, and stack benders become the coveted machines of the time. The early stack machines were either a 2-stack, or 3-stack. The stack heights were fixed, as opposed to today’s highly evolved machines which are multi-stack meaning they have a limited stack height, but as long as the number of stacks could be placed in the height range, it would work.

On a 3-stack machine you could only have a straight clamp and two contours, so it still limited the automotive industry in how many short straights they could have in the vehicle components, or that component became very labor intensive, because the component would have part of it bent on one bender setup, and the balance bent on a second setup.

The auto industry also followed the aircraft industry by reducing the bend radii of the bends in components, bringing on the next rage in tube benders. Which was “Boost bending”. This allowed for multiple 1D bends in a single component, as opposed to the using a Pines bender, where the elbows were bent, and then welded to straight pieces, comprising the complete component. Now, it could all be done on one machine, well, all most.

In the late 90’s there was another innovation which came along to further aid production, and yet save material, and that was cutting the tube after bending. So, bender manufacturers developed various types of “bender cutoffs”, all of which have their advantages, or disadvantages. Some of the disadvantages were only realized after implementing into production. One of the disadvantages is that trimming the tube on the bender utilizes more bender time, so less tubing was being bent, because bender time was taken up by the trim, or parting process. So, industries learned quickly that if it doesn’t have to be cut or trimmed on the bender, do it in a second operation, thus allowing the bender to bend more parts than before.

Now that we’ve reviewed a brief history of tube bending, the one area that seems to get neglected was the wiper towers and post from which the wipers were mounted to. With the tighter bend radii that has developed over the years, and the thinner wall material being bent, the wiper towers, and wipers realize more pressure than ever before. Today’s standard material wall thickness is 1mm, and I personally have worked on developing multiple 90 degree bends on a 69.9 O.D. X 69.9CLR X 0.8mm W.T. for an OEM supplier last year, so 0.8mm wall material is soon to come.

Standard material thicknesses for aircraft material are .035”, .032”, .028”, and .021”, in which some of these are much less than automotive, however the material types are much better to bend. Aircraft materials are Inconel, Titanium, 304SS, and T6061 aluminum in various heat treat. Again, most of these require more pressure from the pressure die to make good bends without wrinkles, and the wiper tower needs to be rigid enough to maintain position when this additional force is applied.

If you have had experience in setting up benders, you are well aware that a wiper post or tower that deflects during bending creates multiple problems, such as wrinkles obviously, the setup person has a difficult time setting the wiper, because all of the rules he or she knows no longer apply, and uncertainty sets in on how to set the wiper on a post that moves during bending. If you bend 1D bends on your bender, and you are setting the wiper with negative rake and getting good bends (no wrinkles), I can assure you that something is moving on your wiper tree! If you are doing 1D bends, and producing excess scrap from wrinkles, I would urge you to investigate if your wiper post or tower is deflecting, and if it is, I would suggest looking at replacing it with a heavy duty tower or post.

The cost of a multi-stack heavy duty wiper tower can be expensive when you look at the price, but weigh it out against the scrap produced, down time due to setup issues, and quickly you will realize the cost is justified in many cases. Once the wiper tower is rigid, I think you will see your scrap reduce, and productivity elevate.

If you have questions about CNC tube bending dies please let us know and one of our experts will be in touch.

You may be interested in these related posts related to wiper Dies and Mandrel Dies:

• The Basics: Tube Bending Dies
• The Purpose of Bend Dies in Rotary Draw Bending 
• Tube Forming Bend Dies Explained